Three Ways to Break Through the Not-Writing Habit

I have sixty minutes to write and edit this blog post. Fifty-nine minutes and twenty-seconds now. Even less, by the time you hit this sentence.

I have sixty minutes because today is unexpected clear of distractions. The farewell I was meant to be attending this evening has been rescheduled. My usual Friday write-club buddy is currently interstate. I am on my own, in my apartment, trying to get shit done with no distractions, and that is bad for me.

If there’s one thing I’m generally pretty good at, it’s getting shit done around other obligations. Give me an eight hour work day followed by three hours of gaming at a friend’s place, and I will bust out my minimum daily pages in record time then squeeze in a blog post for good measure.

Give me twelve uninterrupted hours, and I will binge-watch shit on Netflix and watch interviews with wrestlers on Youtube. I can hold to schedules built around social obligation, but I am terrible at the obligations where the only person I can disappoint is myself or a professional colleague.

And so, the stopwatch is running. Fifty-five minutes and eleven seconds to go. When it’s done, I get a one-hour break, followed by ninety minutes of working on the first draft of a story. Another hour’s break, another ninety-minute burst. The stopwatch creating edges for the work, because it tells me when to start and stop.

Today is all about the intense, controlled burst of productivity followed by a mandatory fallow period where I fuck around and clean the apartment. It’s all about getting shit done.

THE CURSE OF A CAREER WITHOUT EDGES

If there’s one thing that is actually common to every writer in the world, it’s this: none of us feel like we’re doing enough with our time. From the new writer frustrated that they only managed fifty words after a hard day at work, through to the folks powering through six-thousand word days like clockwork, there is always that faintly ambivalent feeling that you should be doing more.

Partially this is because writing doesn’t have a clean edge. Unlike a nine-to-five job, where the parameters of work and not-work are cleanly marked, writing is the kind of thing that permeates your existence. You do not get paid by the hour, you get paid by the finished product, so the feeling that you should do more is inevitably bound up in the idea that more eventually equals money.

A bad day at a salaried job is a bad day, but you still get your paycheque at the end of the week. A bad day at the keyboard feels like it’s costing you money and opportunities down the line. Sometimes, this feeling is valid. Sometimes, it’s just your internal sensible person freaking out about the fact that you’ve chosen a high-risk career and left yourself too little safety net to fall into.

We are not alone in this. Every freelance career and small business that works on commission will know the pain of being reliant on the product instead of the role. If you’re only as good as your work, your work has the potential to be all-consuming.

And artists, well, they’re meant to be consumed by their work. Society has been telling you that ever since you first started stringing words together.

(Thirty-nine minutes and twenty-seven seconds to go)

I posit this approach is potentially damaging to writers. Just because you can’t clearly see the edges, it doesn’t mean they’re not there. It just means that you keep rushing forward, determined to do more, until you look down and discover there’s nothing underneath you but a gaping chasm of burn-out, or writers block, or procrastination.

Especially procrastination.

It’s potentially damaging because, if your work doesn’t have edges, it’s not just knowing when to stop that’s a problem. It’s knowing when to sit down and start.

TRICKING YOURSELF INTO WORKING

Spend enough time talking to writers about their process and you’ll quickly notice the ways people attempt to set up edges for their work. It happens through routines, or word-counts, or timers. It happens through killing themselves to hit deadlines, then giving themselves permission to collapse in a heap afterwards.

It happens through tools that allow for an artificial edge to form, such as pages in a journal or a break-the-chain calendar. Neil Gaiman talks about switching to notebooks because it allowed him to trick himself into thinking it wasn’t really work yet, allowing him to focus on the craft instead of the future. That’s a different kind of edge, but it’s still an edge, and it works.

Everyone tricks themselves into working their own way. Sometimes, the methods shift over time, depending on their project and goals.

When I talk to folks who are well-and-truly stuck – the I want to write more, but I never get around to it crowed – there’s a whole bunch of things I suggest that are basically built on this theory. Ways for people to define the edge, to kick off the writing habit when the writing habit is hard to kick into gear. The three techniques that follow are the ones that have worked best for me and the folks who report back , and for all that they are simple as crap to do, they do a great job of getting you focused on the starting line.

ONE: SET YOURSELF THE DAILY GOAL OF SITTING DOWN AND OPENING YOUR WIP FILE/NOTEBOOK

Creatives have a bad habit of extrapolating outwards to a point of failure, which means a large majority of the folks who aren’t writing regularly are subconsciously focusing on the consequences of the action instead of the action themselves. And so, sitting down to write means finishing a story, which means submitting, which means rejection, which means the possibility that some editor will tell them they have no talent, which means their dream is dead in the water and they should probably give up now.

Many writers can combat this under good circumstances, but when shit gets busy – and shit will get busy incredibly often – it’s easy to set aside the things where your subconscious is whispering about the inevitable failure that awaits.

When in doubt, I borrow from Getting Things Done and next action that shit, asking: what is the absolute next thing you need to do in order to move forward on your project. Invariably, people will answer: I need to write something.

That’s still thinking forward. The absolute next action is sitting down at your workspace, whatever it will be, and opening up your WIP. It’s the first step that allows everything else in writing to occur, and its power as a trigger to start work is underrated.

If you’re struggling to get things done, that is your goal.  Sit down. Open up your work. Read a few sentences or put down a word. If you want to walk away after that, you can, but it’s a useful routine for acknowledging that writing is important to you and it clearly defines the edge that begins your process.

My own approach, increasingly, relies on this one. So long as I sit down to write three times a day, I will usually get a bunch of stuff done, even if I’m not counting pages or using stopwatches to create additional edges

TWO: PLAY FIVE SETS OF CONSEQUENCES

Just as we extrapolate outwards to a point of failure, we also have a tendency to look at the world through a binary lens. Success is regarded as an either/or proposition, when the reality involves a spectrum of possible consequences.

When folks are really stuck, I suggest breaking out a notebook and exploring the possible futures your subconscious is throwing up as roadblocks. Start with the dire – if everything goes wrong at the end of this draft, what is the absolute worst case scenario? What is your next action when that occurs?

Even if your worst case scenario is I write something so horribly bad that my professional career is over before it ever begins – which is incredibly unlikely – there is life after the project and there are options. You can take courses to develop your practice, for example, or you can find other ways to fulfil your creative drive.

Do the same for a bad result, an okay result, a good result, and a great. Open yourself up to the multiplicity of consequences that come with finishing your work, rather than narrowing down to the best and worst, and it gets easier to overcome the fear that lingers at the heart of every writing session.

THREE: FIVE MINUTE DANCE PARTY

Stop trying to write. Instead, pick your favourite song and schedule a five minute dance party where you shake your ass like no-one’s business (my personal preference for this is Mark Ronson’s Feel Right).

Your goal here is to make a complete idiot of yourself, in the privacy of your own home, where no-one is judging you.

After that, sit down and write. In the privacy of your own home, where no-one is judging you. Because, just like your dancing, you are under no obligation to show your work to the outside world until you’re ready.

And, just like the dancing, it will make you feel good for reasons other than showing off to the general public.

Some days, you just have to make writing less important than it was in your mindset. Give it some context and focus on the things you actually enjoy bout the process, rather than the dread of what’s coming at the end.

ONE MINUTE AND TWELVE SECONDS REMAINING

And with that, my alarm is about to go off and my hour of blogging time is done. I’m up against the hard edge of my work, peeps, so I’ll see you in two days for the Sunday Circle. If you’ve got your own techniques for tricking yourself into working, I’d invite you to share them in the comments – I’m always eager to add new approaches into my arsenal.

On Blogging While Under the Weather

I’m in bad shape today. The details are unimportant – insert a huge paragraph about sleep issues and head-colds here, if you must – the important part is that I am very tired and very listless. That feeling you get where you lie awkwardly and cut off circulation to your arm, leaving it feeling numb and faintly foreign as you try to get blood to return? That is my entire body.

Right now, I do a good line in staring absently into the middle distance. Not thinking, just…lost. Tired to the point where the very thought of doing something causes my brain to misfire. I bump into things when I walk around. I drop things: butter knives, coffee mugs, laundry baskets, pens.

And yet, somewhere amid the haze and chaos that is today’s thought process, there was this singular idea: make sure you blog today, even though you don’t feel like it.

Not because I have anything particularly useful to say on this particular Monday. If I waited to have something useful to say, I’d never actually post here. It’s easy to get suckered into giving too much weight to the content, engaging in doubts and second-thoughts. An awful lot of this blog is trusting in the process, blogging to fill the empty spaces in the schedule, using the same four prompts to get me started:

  • What is the most useful thing you can say about writing today?
  • What is bugging you right now and why?
  • What is the most interesting thing going on right now?
  • What’s on your mind?

The rest is simply trusting in the routine and the habit, letting it carry me through on the days where I’m sick, or tired, or utterly convinced that I’m a moron and no-one is ever going to be interested in anything I have to say ever again. Some days, the habit is more important than the content. The content of a particular day may not be flawed, but over a week? A month? A year?

Hell, over the course of a lifetime? Shit’s going to come to come together at least once or twice. Some people have morning affirmations; I have showing up here and giving definition to my approach to writing. Every day, I get a new chance to figure out the kind of writer I want to be, and inch myself a little bit closer to that goal.

And yeah, there are days when I will cut myself some slack. I’m realistic about these things, and nothing pisses me off more than the thou shall write every day if you want to be a writer crowd, ’cause that has the potential to be a stick you beat yourself with rather than a routine that carries you forward.

Real writers approach their craft in all sorts of ways, including those who embrace regular fallow periods rather than burn themselves out creating twenty-four seven. There are writers who only work five days of the week, because they like the idea of weekends. There are writers who will jam out a book in a few intense weeks of creativity, then go back to their day-jobs. No two people are doing this gig the same way.

But once you know your process? Once you’ve found the habits and routines that work for you? Once those are in place, honour them. There will be times when they need to be sacrificed, but always make it a conscious decision rather than a thing you do by default. Habits can get overridden so easily, replaced by a new normal.

I may be in bad shape today, but the blog gets posted because I asked myself one final question: do you really want to sacrifice your routine for this?

Today, the answer was fuck no. Today, the habit matters more to me than that unpleasant feeling that makes it hart to concentrate. Today, it even matters more than the small collection of “in case of emergency” blog posts that I’ve got sitting in reserve, for exactly this kind of eventuality. It matters more than my absolute last resort, which is the Gone Fishing sign.

Tomorrow I get another chance to answer that particular question. With luck and a good deal of dogged persistence, I hope the answer will be much the same.

Blocking, Prose, and the Perfect Combination

A few weeks back, when I first discovered Every Frame a Painting, I spent a lot of time re-watching Tony Szhou’s tribute to Robin Williams and the way he moves in movies. It’s one of the most succinct explanations of the importance of good blocking in a series that is full of great instalments that examine good blocking and framing (see also the episode on movement in the films of Akira Kurasawa, which is brilliant).

The bit that particularly resonated with me was a section where he examines back-to-back clips from Jumangi as an example of what Blocking actually is:

“Good blocking is good storytelling. If you’d like to see this for yourself, pick a scene and watch how the actors move…You can watch this film with the sound off, and still understand most of the story. That’s good blocking. Everything you need to know about the characters, their relationship, and how it changes, is presented to you through physical movement.”

I loved this particular episode because, as a writer, I struggle with blocking. Worse, I like to write the kinds of stories where good, clear blocking would be an incredible advantage, but I’ve never really been able to wrap my head around the way it works in fiction. The clarity that Szhou talks about – the ability to strip everything away from a scene and tell the story in action alone – is a very visual process. Delivering the same same result in prose was a much harder thing to conceptualise.

In one of those incredible acts of good timing, I was reading Jeff VanderMeer’s Wonderbook a few days after I first went through the entire run of Every Frame a Painting. In his section on editing and redrafting, VanderMeer suggest an exercise where you go through each scene and pull out every action or act that occurs there. Not the stuff that happens off-stage, or before/after the scene begins, but the action that occurs in the narrative present.

It was a singularly confronting exercise.

I tried it out on a short story I’d been submitting for a while, which occasionally got nice feedback but ultimately a rejection. The results were…surprising.
Take this example, from the first scene of a short story I’d been submitting without any real success. The moment I separated out the action, the problems became clear.

Selby talked crap.
I didn’t believe her.
Selby found me first, ahead of the others.
She said.
I nodded.
I kept staring at Selby’s hair.
She said.
I said
Selby closed her eyes. She said.
I said.

There were ten action takes within the scene – not a lot, but it’s a short scene, maybe two hundred and fifty words – and nearly half of those were either events that took place outside the narrative present (highlighted in red) or actions that were either internal activity or a continuation of an action I hadn’t established (highlighted in purple).

When you strip those problems out, I’ve got a scene where the most significant action is dialogue, a nod, and a character closing their eyes. Actions that may be significant, if deployed properly, but largely crop up in my writing as a place-holder reaction to something another character says. They’re a narrative pause, not really adding anything significant to the scene.

I found myself thinking of Tony Szhou’s quote about blocking as I did this, because suddenly a means of figuring out blocking in prose seemed possible. VanderMeer follows this exercise up with a list of questions to ask yourself about a scene – does every action have a consequence? Is there true cause and effect? Is your progression from one action to the next sound?

Increasingly, as I applied this exercise to my work, the answer was no.

But figuring out the solutions was so much easier. That scene above? Highlighting the problems like this immediately gave me solutions. Start the scene early, build a sequence around the reveal of the hair. Let that underscore the dialogue and add contrast, rather than relying on the conversation to carry the momentum of the story.

Doing it for the whole story allowed me to go through and mark out the problem actions. No more nodding. No more closed eyes. No more action that takes place outside the narrative frame. A story I thought was pretty good starts to reshape itself into something very different, very new, and ultimately better. I

But this post isn’t about blocking and editorial processes (although, yeah, try that exercise if you’ve never done it before. The feeling of control you get over your work is incredible).

What’s important is this: good writing advice isn’t always obvious. The thing you need to hear will shift by time and expertise, and what seems like ordinary or unimportant advice one day will become incredibly useful the next.

Watching Every Frame A Painting on its own would have piqued my interest in blocking, but not given me a framework for figuring out how to apply it. Wonderbook gave me a framework for applying it, but I’d read that section of the book a dozen times without seizing upon why it was really important to go through that process. It’s the combination of the two, back to back, that allowed for a moment of epiphany where problem and solution were put together in a very clear, very meaningful way.

When it comes to figuring shit out, in writing, you need to cast a broad net and you need to keep paying attention. Put bits of advice together to see how they resonate.

You need a plurality of voices, talking about similar things in very different ways, in order to find the combination that makes the best sense for you.